Legal Opinion

Jernberg Forgings Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 19, 1984No. Court 84-1-00150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RESTANI, Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved for disclosure of six business-confidential documents, or groups of documents, from the administrative record in this case. Plaintiffs’ action challenges two negative aspects of a final affirmative countervailing duty determination concerning certain Italian steel products manufactured by Industria Meccanica e Stampaggio, S.p.A. (I.M.E.S.). Defendant-intervenor I.M.E.S. argues against disclosure. Defendant United States makes no objection to plaintiffs’ motion.

Section 516A(b)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(2)(B) (1982) 1…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Dunn v. Midwestern IndemnityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
  3. Freres v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  4. American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Katunich v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  2. Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. American Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API