Jernberg Forgings Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
RESTANI, Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved for disclosure of six business-confidential documents, or groups of documents, from the administrative record in this case. Plaintiffs’ action challenges two negative aspects of a final affirmative countervailing duty determination concerning certain Italian steel products manufactured by Industria Meccanica e Stampaggio, S.p.A. (I.M.E.S.). Defendant-intervenor I.M.E.S. argues against disclosure. Defendant United States makes no objection to plaintiffs’ motion.
Section 516A(b)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(2)(B) (1982) 1…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Dunn v. Midwestern IndemnityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
- Freres v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Katunich v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- American Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987