Legal Opinion

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. v. Michelson

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 13, 2003No. 01-2373-MLVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*552ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MICHELSON’S MOTION TO COMPEL ELECTRONIC MAIL MESSAGES AND DATA AND REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER

VESCOVO, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is the January 31, 2003 motion of defendant Gary K. Michelson to compel the plaintiff, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., to produce approximately 996 network backup tapes, containing, among other things, electronic mail, plus an estimated 300 gigabytes of othbr electronic data that is not in a backed-up format, all of which contains items potentially responsive to discovery…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Wamiq SATTAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Hagemeyer North America, Inc. v. Gateway Data Sciences Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  3. John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Transamerica Life Insurance v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
  5. AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API