Legal Opinion
State v. Poole
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1991No. C5-91-85PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
This petition for a writ of prohibition seeks a writ restraining the trial judge from considering suppression motions on search warrants issued by the trial judge.
FACTS
Petitioner Dr. James Poole is charged with multiple counts of criminal sexual conduct against several patients. The trial judge signed several search warrants in April and August 1990 authorizing searches of Dr. Poole’s house and place of business. Another judge in the district signed one warrant for another search of Dr. Poole’s residence.
Dr. Poole moved to suppress the evidence seized…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. KettererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. VelishekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique FinchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Comiskey v. District Court in & for the County of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Cano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Cano v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020