Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 10, 1987No. Cl-87-953PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is a state’s appeal from a pretrial order suppressing evidence obtained as a result of a search of respondent. The search was conducted when respondent entered a residence three hours after police arrived to execute a search warrant. The warrant to search the premises contained a clause authorizing a search of “all persons” present at the time the search was executed. This appeal is authorized by Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.04, subd. 1. We affirm.
FACTS
The Freeborn County Sheriffs department, after receiving confidential information of cocaine and marijuana trafficking at 710…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. De SimoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PriorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- United States v. GuadarramaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.