State v. Cermak
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant James Edward Cermak was convicted of 30 counts of criminal sexual conduct.1 He seeks a new trial, claiming the trial court prejudicially erred in denying his motion to remove the designated judge and in determining child witnesses were competent to testify; that he was denied effective assistance of counsel of his choice; that there was prosecutorial misconduct; that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict; and that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering 11 consecutive sentences totalling 480 months of incarceration. We affirm the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Black v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.