State v. Laughlin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
Petitioner Robert Laughlin filed a notice to remove the judge assigned to his case for cause. The chief judge of the judicial district denied the notice. Laughlin petitioned for a writ of prohibition. We remand for reconsideration.
FACTS
When Laughlin and his attorney appeared for trial in this criminal matter and learned the identity of the trial judge, Laughlin filed a notice to remove as a matter of right. The trial judge denied the notice because the trial judge had earlier presided over a hearing in the case. Laughlin then asked the trial judge to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marriage of McClelland v. McClellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Nachtsheim v. WartnickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Shreve v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Marriage of Schack v. SchackCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Powell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Hooper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique FinchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Guth v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.