Legal Opinion

State v. Laughlin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1993No. C2-93-1618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Robert Laughlin filed a notice to remove the judge assigned to his case for cause. The chief judge of the judicial district denied the notice. Laughlin petitioned for a writ of prohibition. We remand for reconsideration.

FACTS

When Laughlin and his attorney appeared for trial in this criminal matter and learned the identity of the trial judge, Laughlin filed a notice to remove as a matter of right. The trial judge denied the notice because the trial judge had earlier presided over a hearing in the case. Laughlin then asked the trial judge to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of McClelland v. McClellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Nachtsheim v. WartnickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Shreve v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Marriage of Schack v. SchackCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Hooper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique FinchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State Ex Rel. Guth v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API