Legal Opinion

Mateo v. Mateo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 20, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

281 N.J. Super. 73 (1995)

656 A.2d 846

PETRA MATEO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MANOLIN MATEO, GRACE R. GARRETT AND ERNEST GARRETT, DEFENDANTS, AND DARRELL FINEMAN, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 22, 1995.

Decided April 20, 1995.

Before Judges BRODY, LONG and A.M. STEIN.

Petra Mateo, appellant, filed a pro se brief.

Capizola, Fineman & Lapham, attorneys for respondent (Barbara R. Lapham, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, P.J.A.D.

The dispute in this appeal is between plaintiff and Darrell Fineman, Esq., the attorney who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. La Mantia v. DurstNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  2. H. & H. Ranch Homes, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Musikoff v. Jay Parrino's the Mint, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Hoffman & Schreiber v. MedinaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  3. Horowitz v. WeishoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Schepisi & McLaughlin v. LoFaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  5. Shalit v. ShalitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API