Legal Opinion

Shalit v. Shalit

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 7, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, J.S.C.

This ruling concerns the issue of whether the filing of a petition to impose and enforce a charging lien on certain funds obtained by the client as a result of the services of client’s litigation counsel must await the expiration of 30 days after service upon the client of a Pre-Action Notice complying with the Fee Arbitration Rules and particularly R. l:20A-6. Based upon the language of R. L20A-6 itself, this court finds that the filing of such a petition need not await the passage of 30 days after service of the Pre-Action Notice. Determination and enforcement of such a lien,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. H. & H. Ranch Homes, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Mateo v. MateoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Diana Burgess v. Walmart, Inc., et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API