Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Weishoff
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 11, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
723 A.2d 121 (1999)
318 N.J. Super. 196
Ronald HOROWITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert P. WEISHOFF, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 15, 1998.
Decided February 11, 1999.
Plaintiff-Appellant on his own behalf.
Stephen Cristal, Mount Holly, for defendant-respondent Robert Weishoff (Mark J. Molz, Hainesport, attorney; Mr. Cristal, on the brief).
Before Judges BROCHIN and KLEINER.
The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.
This case arose from a conflict which erupted between two lawyers during the course of their representation of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kernan v. One Washington Park Urban Renewal AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Jacobs v. PENDELNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- H. & H. Ranch Homes, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Strauss v. FostNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gooch v. Choice Entertaining Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Horowitz v. WeishoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Schepisi & McLaughlin v. LoFaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- W. JAMES MAC NAUGHTON VS. SHAI HARMELECH (L-0442-12, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020