Legal Opinion

Daly-West Mining Co. v. Savage

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1918No. 4914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah; Tillman D. Johnson, Judge. Action by Catherine Savage and others, widow and minor children of John Savage, deceased, against the Daly-West Mining Company and others, for death of deceased. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

The brief filed by counsel for plaintiffs in error does not contain a specification of errors upon which they rely, as required by rule 24 of this court (188 Fed. xvi, 109 C. C. A. xvi). In City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street Light Co., 59 Fed. 756, 8 C. C. A. 253, decided on January 29, 1894, this court announced that this rule “will be enforced by the court, to the end that the vital issues in the case may be clearly presented.” It has been enforced ever since. Kinser v. United States, 231 Fed. 856, 146 C. C. A. 52, Cooper v. Jewett, 233 Fed. 618, 628, 147 C. C. A.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. City of Goldfield v. RogerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  3. Kinser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Cooper v. JewettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hard & Rand, Inc. v. Biston Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Harrow-Taylor Butter Co. v. CrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API