Harrow-Taylor Butter Co. v. Crooks
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
The appellant, the Harrow-Taylor Butter Company, brought this action at law in the court below to recover taxes paid by it, which it claims were illegally assessed under the Act of August 2, 1886, 24 Stat. 209, as amended by the Act of May 9, 1902, 32 Stat. 194, title 26 U. S. Code, c. 7 (26 USCA, c. 7, § 541 et seq.), relating to the taxation of products classed as oleomargarine. A jury was waived and the case tried by the court. The court held that the product which was known as “Rich Nut Shortening” and was composed of a mixture of vegetable oils, salt, benzoate of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- City of Goldfield v. RogerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Kinser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Lohman v. Stockyards Loan Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Loevsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Huffman v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Pepsi-Cola Niagara Bottling Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
- Missouri ex rel. De Vault v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- E. R. Squibb & Sons v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.