Legal Opinion
Zink v. Kessler Trucking Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 8, 1937No. Nos. 109, 110, 111 & 112PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The demurrers to the first count of the several declarations must be sustained for the reason that no actionable negligences are alleged. It is to be presumed that the pleaders have stated their cases in the manner most favorable to themselves. Schwartzman v. Wilmington Stores Co., 2 W. W. Harr. (32 Del.) 7, 117 A. 739; Snavely v. Booth, et al., 6 W. W. Harr. (36 Del.) 378, 176 A. 649. The negligence alleged is the parking of the truck, which had not become disabled, on the improved or main traveled portion of the highway when it was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
- Sussex Finance Co. v. Goslee.Superior Court of Delaware · 1951
- Ajax Distributors, Inc. v. SpringerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Crouse v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Vaughan v. VeaseySuperior Court of Delaware · 1956