Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Veasey

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 20, 1956No. 144PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cabby, J.:

In arguing that the Act deprives defendant of the right to a jury trial, he construes the word “court”, as used therein, to be synonymous with “judge”. With this interpretation, I cannot agree. It is undoubtedly true that those words are sometimes used as synonyms in statutes and are frequently so treated by laymen and lawyers. On the other hand, the word “court” is just as appropriately used to describe a body or organ of the government organized to administer justice, and in this sense it includes both judge and jury. Black’s Law Dictionary, 3d ed. 457; 14 Am. Jur. 249. In any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Dutton Phosphate Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Collison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  4. State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Miles v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mehau v. ReedHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lucky Ned Pepper's Ltd. v. Columbia Park & Recreation Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Carper v. StiftelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. Carper v. StiftelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. Dayton v. CollisonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API