State v. Russell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.
¶1 This case involves the question of whether reviewing jury questionnaires for hardship implicates the public trial right. On each of the first two days of jury selection in this case, the trial judge, the attorneys, and petitioner Frederick David Russell held work sessions to review juror questionnaires and to separate the hardship juror requests from the others. These work sessions occurred in the jury room, rather than in the courtroom, and the trial court did not conduct a Bone-Club1 analysis on the record before holding the work sessions.
¶2 Russell contends that the work sessions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Washington v. Dallin David FortCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. Robles-SierraColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.