Legal Opinion

State v. Brightman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2005No. 72919-1PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Bridge, J.

Nathan Brightman seeks reversal of his conviction for the second degree murder of Dexter Villa. Brightman claims that his constitutional right to public trial was violated when the trial court closed the courtroom to spectators during jury selection. Brightman also argues that the trial court erred when it declined to give his proposed instruction on justifiable homicide.

¶2 We conclude that the trial court erred when it directed that the courtroom would be closed to spectators during jury selection, without fulfilling the requirements set forth in State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. MomahWashington Supreme Court · 2009

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API