Caffey v. Veale
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
W. V. Caffey petitioned the district court of Tulsa county for a writ of mandamus to compel C. H. Veale, mayor, and W. F. Graham, D. H. Pratt, S. R. Smith, and Thomas I. Munroe, comprising the board of commissioners of the city of Tulsa, Okla., to approve the surety bond which he tendered to them as a part of his effort to qualify for the office of chief of police of said city pursuant to an appointment of him to that office theretofore made by said board of commissioners. Upon trial of the matter the district court denied the petition, and Caffey appeals from that ruling.
In his brief, Caffey…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Love v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ross v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Hayman v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Redmond v. Incorporated Town of SulphurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Russell v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arterbery v. HargroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002
- Opinion No. 72-259 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972
- Prosser v. Village of Fox LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Prosser v. Village of Fox LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1982