Legal Opinion

Russell v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1936No. 26021PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county and involves the validity of a zoning ordinance of Oklahoma City under which certain property, formerly zoned for residential purposes, was by action of the city council transferred from the residence or U-l zone to the U-9 or community business zone, and the validity of a building permit issued by the superintendent of buildings of said city to the plaintiff in error, J. pen Russell, authorizing the construction of a business building on the property so rezoned.

The defendant in error, William L. Murphy, brought this action against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cochran v. McClearySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Whitney v. Common Council of HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Young v. YatesMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Hawkins v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  5. Griffin v. MessengerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Caffey v. VealeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Brown v. City of DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Opinion No. 72-259 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API