Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prosser v. Village of Fox Lake

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1982No. 54922Published

1DissentJustice Simon

Section 3 — 11—17 of the Illinois Municipal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 24, par. 3—11—17) requires “the concurrence of a majority of all members then holding office” before an ordinance may be passed by a village board of trustees. The two ordinances in issue received only three “aye” votes — not a majority of the six-member board. One member voted against the measures; one, Richard Hamm, did not vote because the measures concerned his salary; and one member was absent. Unlike the majority, I am forced to conclude that the ordinances did not pass.

The majority contends that trustee Hamm’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Launtz v. People ex rel. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Rea v. EtheridgeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Young v. YatesMontana Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API