Legal Opinion

Toys" R" US, Inc. v. Feinberg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 28, 1998No. 98 Civ. 2780(AGS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Toys “R” Us, Inc. and Geoffrey, Inc., licensee and owner respectively of the Toys “R” Us trademark, bring this action against defendants, appearing pro se, in connection with defendants’ use of the trade names “Guns Are Us,” “Guns are We,” and the internet domain name “gunsareus.com.” The action states claims arising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1), and 1125(a), and New York commercial and trademark law. Plaintiffs move for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs’ motion is denied in its entirety, and summary judgment is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. Brain Pharma, LLC v. ScaliniDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  4. Crossfit, Inc. v. QuinnieDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
  5. Perkins School for the Blind v. Maxi-Aids, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API