Legal Opinion
Perkins School for the Blind v. Maxi-Aids, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2003No. CV 02-2897(ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the following motions by Maxi-Aids, Inc. (“Maxi-Aids”), Elliot Zaretsky, Harold Zaretsky, and Pamela Zaretsky-Stein (collectively, the “defendants”): (1) a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R.Civ.P.); and (2) a motion for joinder under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19.
I. BACKGROUND, The following facts are taken from the complaint, which the Court takes to be true. Perkins School for the Blind (“Perkins” or the “plaintiff’) is a non-profit institution that…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Leonard F. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Van Praagh v. GrattonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- S&L VITAMINS, INC. v. Australian Gold, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Brain Pharma, LLC v. ScaliniDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Pak China Group Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Walgreen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.