Legal Opinion
Maverick Tube Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 24, 2015No. Consol. 14-00244PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter is before the court on plaintiff Maverick Tube Corporation’s (“Maverick”), consolidated plaintiffs Qayirova Bora Sanayi ve Ticaret A.§., and Tosgelik Profil ve Sac Endüstrisi A.§.’s (collectively “Qayirova”), and plaintiff-intervenor United States Steel Corporation’s (“U.S. Steel”) motions for judgment on the agency record pursuant to ÚSCIT Rule 56.2. These parties contest the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final determination in the antidumping (“AD”) investigation of oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) 1 from the Republic of Turkey (“Turkey”).…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- NTN Bearing Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stupp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Hoa Phat Steel Pipe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025
- Maverick Tube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Neo Solar Power Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- ArcelorMittal USA LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.