Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Santamarie

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1928No. Appeal 129PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit. Both parties were agents of the Mutual Life Insurance Company and their offices were close together. In April, 1920, the defendant came to the office of the plaintiff and asked bim if he knew a Mr. Schisler and a Mr. Young and receiving an affirmative reply, he asked the plaintiff if he would introduce him to them for the purpose of writing insurance. The defendant had met the men before, but this was a request that the plaintiff introduce him so that he might open the subject of insurance. The commissions, if insurance were effected, were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. WeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Rosenblatt v. WeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Werber v. WallopDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API