Principal Casualty Insurance Co. v. Norwood
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This appeal involves cross-motions for summary judgment in an action to declare the rights of parties competing for subro-gation proceeds. The question is whether Iowa Code chapter 668 (1989) authorizes an insured to retain a reasonable attorney fee out of subrogation proceeds claimed by an insurer when the recovery stems from settlement with, rather than verdict or judgment against, a third-party tortfeasor. We conclude that section 668.5 authorizes the deduction claimed by the insured, and therefore reverse the district court’s judgment favoring the insurer.
The facts are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beier Glass Co. v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Cookies Food Products, Inc. v. Lakes Warehouse Distributing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Hedgebeth v. MedfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Casteel v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Amica Mutual Insurance v. MaloneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Guiel v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Stillmunkes v. Hy-Vee Employee Benefit Plan & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Krapfl v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Wilson v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.