Legal Opinion

Principal Casualty Insurance Co. v. Norwood

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1990No. 89-1465PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This appeal involves cross-motions for summary judgment in an action to declare the rights of parties competing for subro-gation proceeds. The question is whether Iowa Code chapter 668 (1989) authorizes an insured to retain a reasonable attorney fee out of subrogation proceeds claimed by an insurer when the recovery stems from settlement with, rather than verdict or judgment against, a third-party tortfeasor. We conclude that section 668.5 authorizes the deduction claimed by the insured, and therefore reverse the district court’s judgment favoring the insurer.

The facts are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beier Glass Co. v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cookies Food Products, Inc. v. Lakes Warehouse Distributing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Hedgebeth v. MedfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  5. Casteel v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amica Mutual Insurance v. MaloneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Guiel v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Stillmunkes v. Hy-Vee Employee Benefit Plan & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Krapfl v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Wilson v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API