Legal Opinion

Hedgebeth v. Medford

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 21, 1977PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pashman, J.

The single question in this case is whether the State’s right of subrogation under the New Jersey Medical Assistance and Health Services Program (Medicaid), pursuant to N. J. S. A. 30:4D-7(j), is governed by equitable principles. The State asserts that principles of equitable subrogation normally applied to private insurance carriers are inapplicable under the instant statute. Accordingly, it argues that in seeking reimbursement from a Medicaid recipient who has been successful in obtaining a recovery from a third party tortfeasor, it need…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Illinois Automobile Insurance Exchange v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. John Wanamaker, New York, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. United States v. James F. Merrigan and James F. Merrigan, Jr., and Third-Party v. Thomas J. McKinney Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. White v. SutherlandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. State of Tex. v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
  3. Barreca v. CobbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. Eagan Ex Rel. Keith v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Jeffries v. Kent County Vocational Technical School District Board of EducationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API