Legal Opinion

Stuart Imports, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 3, 1967No. C.D. 2988Published

1Opinion of the Court

OliveR, Judge:

The merchandise under protest, described on the invoice as ice decanters and imported full of Chianti wine, was classified by the collector of customs at the port of San Francisco under paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, as blown glass household articles, dutiable at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff’s sole claim is that the decanters are properly dutiable at only 25% per centum ad valorem under the same paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108, as articles known as bubble glass.

As originally ..enacted, paragraph 218(f) made no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. States v. StrausCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. GandolfiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Mid State Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  5. Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API