Legal Opinion

Mid State Sales Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 6, 1948No. 52579; protests 127874-K, etc. (New York)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These protests are against the action of the collector of customs at the port of New York in assessing duty on certain tortoise shell *210barrettes which were classified for duty as jewelry at rates equivalent to 55 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1527 (a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The importer claims the merchandise to be properly dutiable as manufactures of shell at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1538, or as articles manufactured in whole or in part, not specially provided for, at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the tariff act. It…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Parrott & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Slazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Stuart Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API