Legal Opinion

Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 15, 1955No. C. D. 1737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

At various dates in 1949' and 1950, the plaintiff, Calif-Asia Rattan Company, imported certain furniture, which was assessed with duty by the collector of customs at Los Angeles at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 409 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by Presidential proclamation, as rattan furniture. Liquidation of the entries took place at various dates in July and September 1951.

On August 9, 1951, the plaintiff filed with the collector at Los Angeles a protest—

* * * against your liquidation or your decision assessing, imposing, or collecting duty,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. States v. StrausCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Mid State Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Slazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Stuart Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API