States v. Straus
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Five consignments of earthenware, known as Carmelite ware, were severally entered at the New York customhouse on October 5, 1909, October 21, 1909, November 11, 1909, January 6, 1910, and March 7, 1910. The collector of customs classified the merchandise as brown earthenware covered with a transparent vitrified glaze, and assessed it for duty at 55 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 94 of the tariff act of 1909, which paragraph reads as follows: •
94. China, porcelain, parían, bisque, earthen, stone and crockery ware, plain white, plain brown, including clock cases with or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cramer v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. KlingenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hadden v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Frank v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- National Hat Pin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Tower Manufacturing & Novelty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. GandolfiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.