Legal Opinion
Mauser v. Raytheon Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 9, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-10215 RCLPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
YOUNG, District Judge.
Introduction
The plaintiff, Gary Mauser, has sued his employer, Raytheon Company, and the Ray-theon Company’s employee pension plan (“the Plan”) under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Mauser seeks to have his pension, as computed on his salary for a pre-1981 stint of employment, reckoned according to the formula for the calculation of pension benefits that became effective in January, 1981 (the “Amended Formula”). Specifically, he seeks a declaratory…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mauser v. Raytheon Co. Pension Plan for Salaried EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Colón RiveraDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Joyce v. John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Wade v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Spanos v. TJX Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.