Legal Opinion

Mauser v. Raytheon Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 27, 2001No. 99-1895, 99-1896PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Mauser appeals from the district court’s summary judgment for Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees and Raytheon Company (together, Ray-theon) as to his claims that (1) Raytheon arbitrarily and capriciously denied him pension benefits; (2) Raytheon should be estopped from denying him benefits; and (3) Raytheon violated its fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Mauser also contests the remedy and attorneys’ fees awarded by the district court after trial on his fourth claim,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. SabolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Bard v. Boston Shipping Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Ting Ji v. Bose Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Kifafi v. Hilton Hotels Retirement PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. United States v. Jeronimo-BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API