Legal Opinion
Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City & County of Honolulu
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided November 9, 2004No. CV 03-00154DAEBMKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID ALAN EZRA, Chief Judge.
The Court heard Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment on November 8, 2004. Robert J. Muise, Esq., and Robert K. Matsumoto, Esq., appeared at the hearing on behalf of Plaintiffs. Gregory J. Swartz, Esq., and Jon Van Dyke, Esq., appeared at the hearing on behalf of Defendants. After reviewing the motion and the supporting and opposing memo-randa, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Center for Bio-Eth v. HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Miller v. HeimullerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024