Legal Opinion
Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City & County of Honolulu
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2006No. 04-17496PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The Opinion filed on May 23, 2006, is amended as follows:
On slip Opinion page 5645, line 10 of footnote 1, insert the following text before the sentence that begins with “We note that Hawaii Revised Statute ... ”: Neither did the district court abuse its discretion in denying the Center’s request to amend its complaint. See Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank, 295 F.3d 966, 976 (9th Cir.2002) (“We review for abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend after a responsive pleading has been filed.”).
On slip Opinion page 5646, line 32,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Kroll v. Incline Village General Improvement DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
- Jamaul Monk v. Terri Gonzalez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Elwyn Patoc v. Lexington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kroll v. INCLINE VILLAGE GENERAL IMP. DIST.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.