Legal Opinion
Gurguis v. Frankel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 17, 2006No. AC 25405PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant L.G. DeFelice, Inc.,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, The*164resa Gurguis, Gamal Gurguis and Meena Gurguis.2 The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) the defendant had a duty to warn the plaintiff of a declivity3 existing between the pavement and grassy shoulder of a portion of highway along Interstate 395, (2) the defendant had a duty to warn the plaintiff of the declivity even though the state had no such duty to warn the plaintiff and (3) there was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Paige v. Saint Andrew's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Malloy v. Town of ColchesterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Right v. BreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Censor v. ASC Technologies of Connecticut, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Perry v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Millette v. Connecticut Post Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Spilke v. WicklowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Davis v. Connecticut Community Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.