Paige v. Saint Andrew's Roman Catholic Church Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
*16 Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether thére was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s factual finding that the negligence of an unidentified employee, agent or servant of the defendant caused the plaintiffs injuries. The named defendant, St. Andrew’s Roman Catholic Church Corporation,1 appeals2 from the judgment of the trial court, following a jury trial, in which the jury found for the plaintiff, Thelonious Paige. We conclude that the evidence of causation was insufficient. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff brought this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Craine v. Trinity CollegeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.