Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Whitted

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 1, 2024No. 47ag/21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Stephen E. Whitted, AG No. 47, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Gould, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION The Supreme Court of Maryland sanctioned an attorney with an indefinite suspension for repeatedly filing retaliatory meritless claims against his ex-wife, her new husband, her attorneys, and judges who ruled against him; filing meritless appeals; repeating failed arguments; and ignoring rulings. Because such actions took place in tribunals in the State of Washington, the Supreme Court found that the attorney’s conduct…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SperyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Janusz v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. PisnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  2. In re: Paul Eric PetruskaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2025
  3. In the Matter of Stephen Earl WhittedSupreme Court of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API