Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Markle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 69 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This was an action brought by the appellees against the appellants, the object of which was to prevent the relocation of the county-seat of Clay county, and to ’enjoin the board of commissioners from letting a contract for the erection of a court-house and jail at the proposed new county-seat. The complaint was in two paragraphs. The plaintiffs annexed an affidavit to the complaint that the allegations therein were true as they verily believed.

A temporary inj unction was granted, as prayed for. Afterward the appellants moved the court to dissolve the injunction. Amongst the reasons stated for…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Board of Commissioners v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Jackson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Stoddard v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Davidson v. KoehlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API