Johnson v. Long
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict. There was no motion for a new trial and judgment was entered on the verdict. Defendant appealed from the judgment. He makes nine assignments of error. Two of them question the propriety of remarks made by the court at the trial, but no objection was made nor exception taken to either of these remarks. Two of them question rulings made at the trial in respect to the admission of testimony, but no exception was taken to either of these rulings. These four assignments raise no question of substance even if this court could consider them. This is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Cincinnati Time Recorder Co. v. LoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Peterson v. Township of ManchesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Taylor v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State Bank v. RonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pitzen v. NordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928