Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Ronan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 1919No. 21,449PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ Action in the district court for Nobles county to recover $3,035.70 upon defendant’s check. The ease was tried before Nelson, J., who when plaintiff rested denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action, and a jury which returned a verdict for $3,141.96. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

On May 10, 1918, defendant drew a check upon the plaintiff bank for $3,035.70, payable to the order of Ed. Kizer, and delivered it to Kizer in payment of cattle bought. It is alleged that Kizer on the same day for value sold and indorsed the check to the First National Bank of Wilmont ; that two days later the Wilmont bank for value sold and indorsed the check to the ‘State Bank of Worthington; that the latter bank, in turn, for value sold and indorsed the check to plaintiff on May 23, 1918; that when plaintiff received the check defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ogren v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Gray Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Cosmopolitan State Bank v. SommervoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Johnson v. LongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API