Legal Opinion
Carter v. University of Medicine & Dentistry
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 6, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-3645 (NHP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLITAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of defendants Victor Turna, M.D. and Metuchen Pediatric Associates, P.A., for partial summary judgment dismissing the individual claims of plaintiffs Gail P. Carter and Craig A. Carter on the grounds that such claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. I heard oral argument in this matter and reserved decision. For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment is hereby DENIED.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiffs Gail P. Carter and Craig A. Carter, individually and on behalf of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Penn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Gutin v. Washington Township Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Carter v. University of Medicine & Dentistry of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Francis RUDNICKI and Pamela Rudnicki, as parents, guardians and next friends of Alexander Rudnicki, a minor child v. Peter BIANCO, D.O.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021