Legal Opinion

Hanefeld v. Fairbrother

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1934No. 29,887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

The trial without a jury resulted in a decision for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Plaintiff is the daughter of Ellison Mooers, late a respected and well to do citizen of Cottonwood county. Testate, he departed this life June 13, 1931, survived by Cora F. Mooers, his second wife. She followed him in death in 1932. The purpose of this action is to recover from the administrator of her estate and her heirs, the other defendants, the property of Mr. Mooers, deceased, which passed to her under his will. Plaintiff claims under contract.

The first Mrs. Mooers died in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Laird v. VilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. Carlson v. KrantzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Klessig v. LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Greenfield v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Mosloski v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCarty v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Halverson v. BergeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Larson v. DahlstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API