Legal Opinion

Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Gilleran

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1903No. S.F. No. 2365PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

In a suit on a promissory note purporting to-have been made by the defendants, and set out at length in. the complaint, the defendant Anne Gilleran, who is the wife' of the other defendant, suffered default; and after an answer by her husband and a trial of the issues thus raised, judgment was entered against both for the amount of the note ($763.33) and costs. Afterwards she moved to set aside the judgment and default; and the motion being denied, she now appeals from the judgment and from the order. But in the absence of any reference in the brief of appellant’s counsel to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Tuttle v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dooling v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Brasher v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Copper King v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  4. First Small Business Inv. Co. v. Sistim, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Thompson v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API