Legal Opinion

Dooling v. Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Nevada. Motion for rehearing. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

*142The judgment in this case was reversed on the argument. The respondent now moves for a rehearing, alleging that this ■ Court never acquired jurisdiction of the case, the time to appeal having expired before the appeal was taken. Upon the examination of the record, we find the position correct. The appeal is from the judgment of the County Court, rendered on an appeal from a Justice’s Court.' The judgment was entered on the nineteenth of January, 1861, and the appeal was taken on the eighteenth of November following—more than ninety days afterwards. The statute limits the period within which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dooling v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carpentier v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Kline v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bithorn v. BallSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1911
  5. Bithorn v. BallSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API