Cherry Hill Vineyard, LLC v. Baldacci
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal calls upon us to assess Maine’s decision to allow small wineries to operate partially outside the usual strictures of the State’s alcohol control laws. The plaintiffs challenge this decision on the ground that it constitutes impermissible favoritism in violation of the dormant commerce clause. The district court found the challenge wanting.
While the central principles on which the dormant commerce clause operates are well-developed, gray areas exist around the edges. We believe that Maine’s exception for small wineries falls within one of these gray…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Family Winemakers of California v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- International Franchise Ass'n v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Freeman v. CorzineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Kleinsmith v. ShurtleffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- López-Muñoz v. Triple-S Salud, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.