Legal Opinion

Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 16, 2017No. 16-101CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER 1

LETTOW, Judge.

Pending before the court in this post-award bid protest are an application by plaintiff, Q Integrated Companies, LLC (“Q Integrated”), for an award of bid preparation and proposal costs (“bid costs”) pursuant to RCFC 54(d)(1), the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(2), and the court’s judgment, as stated in the opinion and order entered on April 20, 2016, see Q Integrated Cos., LLC v. United States, 126 Fed.Cl. 124, 148 (2016) (“Q Integrated F), appeal dismissed, 691 Fed.Appx. 906, No. 2016-1991 (Fed. Cir. June 2, 2016), and a motion for attorneys’ fees and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. A Squared Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  2. Arxium, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  3. Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  4. Mayvin, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  5. St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API