Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. . Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1911PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for the death of his son, which is alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The intestate of plaintiff, his 6-year-old son, was killed by an electric shock received from a loose guy wire, suspended from a pole on which was strung the wires supplying defendant with power to run its cotton mill. This pole was on defendant's property and belonged to it. The guy wire was attached to the top of the pole, and fastened at the other end to a piece of timber in the ground. This guy wire was for the purpose of holding…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Dobbins v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Haynes v. Kaleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Snare & Triest Co. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ford Ex Rel. Ford v. Blythe Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Arrington v. Town of PinetopsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Hedgepath v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Barlow v. . GurneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Pugh v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API