Ford Ex Rel. Ford v. Blythe Bros.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The appellant does not bring forward in its brief and discuss or cite any authority in support of these assignments of error: Nos. 1 through 10, 16, 25, 29 and 30. Therefore, each one of them will be deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of-Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544.
Assignment of error No. 17, based on an exception to the refusal of the court below to sustain its motion for judgment as of nonsuit, interposed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence, presents the crucial question involved in this appeal.
The evidence clearly establishes the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- McGhee v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Fitch v. Selwyn Village, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Comer v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Lyshak v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Arnold Hashtani v. Duke Power Company, a Corporation of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.