Legal Opinion

Snare & Triest Co. v. Friedman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 15, 1909No. 49PublishedCited by 59 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Cóurt of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

The case brought before us by this writ of error, is as follows:

Suit was brought in the court below by the defendant in error (hereinafter called the plaintiff), against the plaintiff in error (hereinafter called the defendant), to recover for personal injuries received through the alleged negligence of the said defendant. At the time of the occurrences in question, certain persons, trading under the firm name of Colgate & Co., were the owners of lands, and the buildings thereon erected, in the city of Jersey City, in the state of New Jersey, bordering on a public street…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Zaloga v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Simmons v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Gnau v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API