Legal Opinion
Millicent Bailey v. Southwest Gas Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 17, 2002No. 00-15796PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
In this case we consider an employer’s and an employee’s duties and obligations under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), codified at 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654. Millicent Bailey appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on her claims for interference with her rights under the FMLA, and for retaliatory discharge under Nevada law. Bailey contends that her employer, Southwest Gas Company (“Southwest”), terminated her in violation of the FMLA, and that her discharge constitutes unlawful retaliation under state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Penny Bachelder Mark Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Ellis v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Allum v. Valley Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Wayment v. HolmesNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Bigelow v. BullardNevada Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by24 opinions
- Xin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ridings v. Riverside Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Maynor v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Muhleisen v. Wear Me Apparel LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Blanck v. HagerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.