Legal Opinion

Siegelman v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1991No. 89-1020, 89-1104PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case presents the question of whether the financial institution excise tax, levied pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, §40-16-1 et seq., applies to the credit card business conducted by national banks located outside Alabama with Alabama residents. The trial court, relying on this Court's decision inEx parte Dixie Tool Die Co., 537 So.2d 923 (Ala. 1988), held that because Alabama's financial institution excise tax was enacted at a time when the State was prohibited by federal law from taxing out-of-state national banks and the legislature was aware of this federal law when enacting the tax, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. HodgenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. WATER WORKS AND SEWER BOARD OF SELMA v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ex Parte Uniroyal Tire Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Christopher v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API