Legal Opinion

Swyden v. Killiam

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1975No. 46310PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice.

The trial court in this case admitted certain hospital records into evidence over Defendant’s objections, after same had been identified by Plaintiff’s (Appellee’s) doctor. Thereafter the Defendant’s (Appellant’s) doctor, likewise an expert, was cross-examined, sometimes directly from the hospital records.

Two questions are immediately presented for decision:

1. Were the hospital records correctly admitted into evidence ?

2. Was the cross-examination of Defendant doctor proper under the circumstances ?

The pertinent facts revealed by the record are that Plaintiff suffered from a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Webber v. McCormickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Colley v. SappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Nye v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Simon v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Shinn v. FrancisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turney v. AnspaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Kinkead v. Western Atlas International, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Osborne v. Mollman Water Conditioning, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Aggressive Carriers, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. C-P Integrated Services, Inc. v. Muskogee City-County Port AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API